Tu veux rejoindre un club, en fonder un, ou publier un article? C'est par ici! You'd like to join or start a club? Publish your articles? Over here!
Mieraf Mesfin Girma
December 4, 2025
Mieraf Mesfin Girma, Gibson School Systems, mirafmesfin9@gmail.com
Thank you for the guidance of Linsay Flowers mentor from Ottawa University in the development of this research.
Media Framing of Sexual Abuse Involving School-Age Girls in Rural Ethiopia: A Qualitative Content Analysis (2020–2025)
Abstract - This qualitative content analysis examines how Ethiopian news media framed sexual abuse cases involving school-age girls (aged 5–18) between 2020 and 2025, with particular attention to rural incidents. Grounded in framing theory, 27 purposively sampled articles from government-affiliated and independent
outlets were analysed using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach. Four dominant frames emerged: institutional response (59 %), victim-blaming (44 %), perpetrator-excusing (37 %), and advocacy-oriented (26 %). Rural cases (only 22 % of the sample) were severely underrepresented and characterised by extreme brevity, absence of survivor voices, episodic framing, and euphemistic language, whereas urban cases received greater narrative depth and occasional systemic critique. Government-aligned media emphasised state efficacy; independent outlets highlighted structural failures. The findings reveal geographic erasure and linguistic minimisation that perpetuate stigma and silence rural victims, underscoring the urgent need for geographically equitable, survivor-centred journalism.
Index Terms - Gender-based violence, Geographic erasure, Media framing, Rural Ethiopia, School-age girls, Sexual violence
Introduction
Sexual abuse of school-age girls (aged 5–18) remains one of Ethiopia’s most pervasive yet least publicly recognised human rights violations. In rural regions, which are home to more than 80 % of the population, girls routinely face sexual violence while walking long distances to school, collecting water from distant streams, or performing household chores in isolated fields and forests. Poverty forces many families to prioritise boys’ education, leaving girls to travel alone on unmarked paths that cut through bushland for five, ten, or even fifteen kilometres each way. Early marriage practices, inadequate school infrastructure with no fences or lighting, chronic understaffing of rural police posts, and deeply entrenched cultural norms that equate family honour with female silence create an environment in which abuse is both commonplace and systematically concealed. Recent empirical studies estimate that between 31 % and 34 % of female students have experienced some form of sexual violence during their schooling, and researchers consistently emphasise that rural prevalence is almost certainly higher because of chronic under-reporting, fear of ostracism, and intense community pressure to resolve cases privately through elder mediation rather than formal justice systems (Hailu et al., 2024; Mekonnen et al., 2024).
Despite a series of progressive legislative and policy reforms—the 2005 Criminal Code amendments that explicitly criminalised marital rape and child sexual abuse, the 2018 National Costed Roadmap to End Child Marriage and Female Genital Mutilation, and the 2023 National Gender-Based Violence Policy Framework—enforcement in remote areas remains conspicuously weak. Courts are often hundreds of kilometres away, public transport is scarce or non-existent, police outposts are under-resourced and understaffed, and local elders frequently mediate disputes in ways that prioritise reconciliation, compensation, or marriage between victim and perpetrator over prosecution and victim support. In this institutional vacuum, news media emerge as one of the very few mechanisms capable of transforming private, localised suffering into a matter of national public concern and political accountability.
The five-year period under examination, from 2020 to 2025, was exceptionally turbulent and therefore analytically rich. It encompassed the Tigray civil war and its devastating aftermath, the rapid proliferation of digital news platforms and social-media penetration even into rural areas, recurring climate-induced food crises and drought, soaring inflation that further strained household survival strategies, and shifting gender-policy priorities under the Prosperity Party government. These overlapping shocks and transformations created a unique historical conjuncture: a moment when national and international attention to gender-based violence arguably reached its highest level in decades, yet routine, peacetime sexual violence against rural schoolgirls continued largely unseen and unremarked in mainstream media narratives.
This study examines how Ethiopian news media framed cases of sexual abuse involving school age girls during these five critical years, with particular and deliberate attention to rural incidents that have historically been marginalised in both research and public discourse.
The paper is structured as follows:
A literature review synthesises existing knowledge on prevalence, media representation, and persistent research gaps.
A dedicated section presents the personal and intellectual rationale for the study, states the central research question and specific objectives, and articulates its scientific and social significance.
The methodology describes the qualitative content analysis design, purposive sampling strategy, and analytical procedures.
The results section details the dominant frames identified, the stark rural–urban disparities, ownership differences, and pervasive linguistic patterns.
The discussion interprets these findings in relation to framing theory, journalistic ethics, and policy implications while acknowledging limitations.
Finally, the conclusion summarises the core insights and proposes concrete, actionable pathways forward for more equitable and survivor-centred media practice in Ethiopia.
Literature Review
Research on sexual violence against school-age girls (aged 5–18) in Ethiopia can be organised into four broad, interconnected themes that collectively underscore both the severity of the crisis and the persistent limitations of existing scholarship.
The first and most developed theme consists of prevalence and risk-factor studies, which consistently document alarmingly high rates of sexual violence, particularly in rural and peri-urban settings. Hailu et al. (2024), in a cross-sectional survey of 412 high-school girls in Soddo Town and surrounding rural kebeles in Southern Ethiopia, found that 34.2 % had experienced at least one form of sexual violence, ranging from unwanted touching to completed rape. Key risk factors identified included entrenched patriarchal attitudes, inadequate parental or family discussion of sexual and reproductive health, long and unsafe walking distances to school (often 5–15 km), and school environments marked by poor lighting, absence of perimeter fencing, and minimal adult supervision after classes. Similarly, Mekonnen et al. (2024) reported a lifetime prevalence of 31.8 % among 384 secondary-school students in the predominantly rural Arba Minch Zuria woreda, emphasising poverty-driven early marriage, cultural tolerance of bride abduction, and the normalisation of teacher–student sexual relationships as “love affairs.” These findings are consistent with broader Sub-Saharan African patterns: Abdullahi et al.’s (2019) systematic review and meta-analysis of 28 studies estimated a pooled prevalence of childhood sexual violence between 18 % and 37 %, with schools and school routes repeatedly identified as primary sites of abuse. Although these quantitative studies powerfully illustrate the systemic and structural nature of the problem, they almost never examine how public narratives—especially those constructed and circulated by news media—influence stigma, formal reporting behaviour, help-seeking patterns, or girls’ continued access to education.
A second theme examines media representation of gender-based violence more broadly and reveals enduring patterns of sensationalism, episodic framing, and structural avoidance. Ejigu’s (2008) pioneering analysis of 120 Ethiopian newspaper articles published between 2005 and 2007 remains the most comprehensive local study: it concluded that girls were overwhelmingly portrayed as passive, at best, passive victims requiring rescue and, at worst, complicit through alleged “risky behaviour,” while sexual violence itself was framed as isolated individual tragedy rather than a predictable outcome of systemic failure. This pattern persists internationally. Bello et al. (2020), using machine-learning techniques on more than 10,000 global news articles, demonstrated that criminal proceedings, graphic injury descriptions, and courtroom drama dominate coverage, whereas poverty, unsafe school infrastructure, long commutes, and survivor recovery are systematically marginalised.
In Ethiopia’s rapidly expanding digital sphere, Nigatu and Raji (2024) showed that Amharic language YouTube recommendation algorithms frequently redirect users searching for educational or religious content toward sexualised videos, thereby amplifying spectacle and shock value rather than prevention or contextual understanding.
Collectively, these studies suggest that both traditional and digital media often reinforce stereotypes and hinder prevention efforts, yet none specifically investigates downstream effects on young, rural audiences or differentiates between government-aligned and independent outlets.
A third theme highlights the dramatic visibility gap between conflict-related sexual violence and routine, peacetime abuse. Systematic weaponisation of rape during the Tigray war (2020–2022) received sustained international attention, detailed UN investigations, and calls for war-crimes prosecution (The Guardian Staff, 2025). By contrast, everyday sexual violence in schools, homes, and villages across non-conflict regions attracts only sporadic, decontextualised mentions that rarely progress beyond the initial police report (Obamo, 2025). This disparity constructs conflict
related atrocities as exceptional horrors worthy of global outrage while normalising peacetime abuse as inevitable background noise, even though the latter affects orders of magnitude more girls on a daily basis.
The fourth and final theme is the near-total absence of longitudinal, experimental, or causal research linking media framing to measurable behavioural or educational outcomes. Cross sectional prevalence studies (Hailu et al., 2024; Mekonnen et al., 2024), content analyses (Ejigu, 2008; Bello et al., 2020), and algorithmic audits (Nigatu & Raji, 2024) provide rich description but cannot determine whether sensationalised or victim-blaming coverage increases fear-driven school absenteeism, whether survivor-centred narratives encourage formal reporting, or how stigmatising language affects mental health trajectories among rural girls. The field therefore remains largely descriptive, retrospective, and—crucially—urban-biased in both data collection and analytical focus.
Taken together, these four bodies of work leave several critical gaps that the present study directly addresses. First, rural school-age girls have never been centred as the primary subjects of media framing research in Ethiopia; existing studies either aggregate all age groups or prioritise urban and conflict-related cases. Second, media ownership—government-affiliated versus independent—is almost never differentiated, despite its obvious implications for frame selection and source access. Third, radio, which remains the dominant information source for more than 80 % of rural households (UNESCO, 2023), is routinely excluded from content analyses due to the absence of transcripts. Fourth, linguistic mechanisms of responsibility deflection—euphemism, passive voice, moralistic appeals to “honour” or “tradition—remain under-theorised as active framing devices rather than mere stylistic choices.
By deliberately prioritising rural incidents, systematically comparing government-aligned and independent outlets, treating geography and linguistic deflection as explicit framing moderators, and grounding the analysis in framing theory, this study seeks to fill these interconnected omissions and provide a more nuanced understanding of how media contribute to the continued marginalisation of Ethiopia’s most vulnerable girls.
Research Rationale, Question, Objectives, and Significance
My encounter with this topic did not begin in academic journals but in August 2023, when the brutal rape and murder of seven-year-old Heaven Awot in Bahir Dar violently shattered the fragile sense of safety many Ethiopian families still cling to. A single mother and nurse, Abekyelesh Adeba, had lived in the same rented house for two years. One evening, she watched her daughter step out to use the outdoor toilet—and Heaven never returned. The landlord, Getnet Baye, strangled her, forced sand and pebbles into her mouth, mutilated her genitalia, and slashed her legs with blades to stage an accident. He then attempted to silence the family with a bribe. For nearly a year, the case remained buried. It surfaced only when Abekyelesh, driven by grief and desperation, began posting raw videos and photographs on social media around the first anniversary of her daughter’s death. Within weeks, an online petition demanding justice gathered over 240,000 signatures, fueled by public outrage at the perpetrator’s 25-year sentence—an outcome widely perceived as yet another miscarriage of justice.
As I followed the case and spoke to residents in Bahir Dar, I uncovered at least four similarly horrific child murders in the same town—cases that never reached the police, the courts, or the media because the victims’ families lacked smartphones, internet access, or the social capital to make their stories go viral. A search of digital archives of major Ethiopian news outlets revealed that Heaven’s case had appeared only fleetingly, and sensationally, because social media had forced it into existence. Thousands of other cases left no trace at all.
In an interview with Eyoha Media, Abekyelesh clutched a photograph of Heaven in her little dress and said, “If my videos had been ignored like all the others, it would be as if she had never lived.”
That sentence crystallized a profound and painful disjuncture in contemporary Ethiopia: the stark divide between lived suffering and mediated visibility. It convinced me that news media—and, at times, even social media—do not merely report social problems; they actively determine whose pain is granted public existence, whose grief is deemed worthy of collective recognition, and whose demand for justice is permitted to matter.
This study is therefore guided by one central research question: In what ways did Ethiopian news media represent cases of sexual abuse involving school-age girls in rural areas between 2020 and 2025?
Four specific objectives flow directly from this question.
The first is to identify and describe the dominant frames employed in such coverage. The second is to compare framing practices—including narrative depth, source selection, emotional tone, linguistic choices, and structural contextualisation—across rural versus urban incidents and between government-affiliated and independent outlets.
The third is to analyse the rhetorical and linguistic devices (euphemism, passive voice, victim blaming tropes, moralistic appeals to “honour” or “tradition”) that minimise or deflect perpetrator responsibility and amplify or displace stigma onto victims and families. The fourth is to formulate concrete, evidence-based recommendations for more geographically equitable and survivor centred journalistic practice.
Scientifically, the research addresses several long-standing gaps simultaneously. No previous study has centred rural school-age girls as the primary subjects of media-framing analysis in Ethiopia; existing work either aggregates age groups or privileges urban and conflict-related cases. Media ownership—government-affiliated versus independent—has rarely been systematically differentiated despite its obvious implications for frame selection and critical distance.
Geography and linguistic deflection have never been treated as explicit framing moderators rather than incidental variables. By deliberately prioritising rural incidents, comparing ownership types, and examining how the same frame can function as amplification in urban reports yet erasure in rural ones, this study extends framing theory itself and offers the first comprehensive account of urban bias in contemporary Ethiopian gender-based violence discourse.
Socially, the stakes could not be higher. When rural girls’ experiences are flattened into brief, voiceless “tragic incidents” devoid of context or agency, public empathy, donor funding, NGO programming, and policy attention remain stubbornly urban-centred. Perpetrators in remote woredas continue to enjoy near-total impunity, and legislative reforms—the 2005 Criminal Code amendments, the 2018 National Costed Roadmap to End Child Marriage and FGM, and the 2023 Gender-Based Violence Policy Framework—remain largely unimplemented in areas where the problem is rarely framed as a public crisis requiring structural solutions. This geographic injustice sustains a cruel two-tier system of recognition: urban survivors are more likely to be constructed as credible victims deserving support and protection, whereas rural girls are rendered invisible or implicitly blameworthy through suggestions that they “should have been more careful” or that their families failed in supervision.
By exposing the mechanisms through which brevity becomes erasure, official sources crowd out survivor voices, and euphemism dilutes brutality, this study seeks to inform targeted interventions: mandatory trauma-informed journalism modules in university curricula and in-service training, investment in community radio stations broadcasting in local languages, the drafting of national ethical guidelines for GBV reporting that explicitly mandate geographic equity and linguistic responsibility, and rural media-literacy programmes that empower families and girls to recognise and challenge stigmatising frames. Only when rural schoolgirls are transformed from silenced statistics into rights-bearing citizens whose stories demand accountability and systemic change can Ethiopia begin to claim meaningful progress toward gender justice. Making the invisible visible is therefore not only an academic contribution but a moral and political imperative.
Methodology
This study adopts qualitative content analysis (QCA) as its core methodological approach to investigate the framing of sexual abuse cases involving school-age girls (aged 5–18) in Ethiopian news media between 2020 and 2025. Qualitative content analysis is especially appropriate for framing studies because it moves beyond surface-level description or simple frequency counts and instead privileges interpretive depth, contextual sensitivity, and the systematic deconstruction of meaning-making processes embedded in media texts.
It allows the researcher to examine not only what is explicitly stated but also how particular linguistic choices, narrative structures, source hierarchies, emotional registers, rhetorical strategies, thematic emphases, and deliberate omissions work together to construct particular versions of reality.
In the context of sexual violence against rural schoolgirls, such an approach is indispensable because the harm is often reproduced not through outright denial but through subtle discursive mechanisms: euphemisation, agent deletion, temporal displacement, geographic erasure, and the systematic privileging of official voices over those of survivors and their families.
The theoretical scaffolding of the analysis rests primarily on Robert Entman’s (1993) widely cited definition of framing, which posits that to frame is to select some aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient in a communicating text in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and/or treatment recommendation. Entman’s framework is complemented by insights from Gamson and Modigliani (1989) on media packages and interpretive repertoires, as well as by feminist adaptations of framing theory (e.g., Lamb, 1999; Meyers, 2004; Benedict, 1992) that highlight how gendered power relations are routinely reproduced through victim-blaming scripts, myths of stranger danger, and the erasure of structural and everyday forms of violence.
By integrating these perspectives, the study traces how Ethiopian media frames simultaneously reflect and reinforce a deeply stratified social order in which urban, elite, and conflict-related suffering is granted visibility and moral urgency, while the routine, peacetime violations experienced by rural girls remain largely outside the sphere of public recognition and political accountability.
Data were collected from newspaper articles and online news reports published in Amharic and English by major Ethiopian outlets during the six-year period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2025. The outlets were deliberately chosen to represent the country’s polarised media landscape: government-affiliated platforms (Ethiopian News Agency – ENA, Fana Broadcasting Corporate, Walta Information Centre, Ethiopian Press Agency products) and prominent independent or privately owned outlets (Addis Standard, The Reporter Ethiopia, Capital Ethiopia, Addis Fortune, Ethiopia Insight, and Addis Zeybe).
This binary distinction between state-aligned and independent media is analytically crucial because ownership structures in Ethiopia profoundly shape editorial priorities, source access, linguistic register, and the degree of critical distance journalists can maintain from official narratives.
Sampling followed a purposive, criterion-based strategy designed to maximise theoretical relevance, narrative richness, and variation along three key dimensions: geographic location of the incident (rural vs. urban/peri-urban), media ownership type, and the presence of identifiable framing devices.
Articles were included only if they met all of the following criteria: (a) they reported a specific incident or tightly linked cluster of incidents of sexual abuse or attempted sexual abuse; (b) the victim or victims were female, aged 5–18, and either enrolled in school or travelling to or from school at the time of the incident; (c) the incident occurred within Ethiopia’s national territory (excluding diaspora or refugee-camp cases); and (d) the article contained sufficient descriptive and contextual detail, typically a minimum of 150 words of substantive narrative, to permit meaningful framing and linguistic analysis. Articles were excluded if they offered only passing references, presented aggregated statistics without case-specific narration, focused exclusively on court proceedings or sentencing without describing the original incident, or functioned primarily as opinion pieces or editorials rather than news reports.
The search process combined multiple strategies to overcome the well-documented incompleteness and frequent deletion of Ethiopian digital archives. Keywords and phrases in both Amharic (e.g., ደፋር, መድፈር, ወሲብ ጥቃት, ገፈፋ/ተገፋ, ተማሪ ሴት ልጅ, ትምህርት ቤት መንገድ, አፈና, ደፈራ) and English (rape, sexual violence, abduction, defilement, schoolgirl, student, minor, assault) were used across the internal search functions of each outlet’s website.
Where archives were missing, paywalled, or had been removed, site-specific Google searches, Boolean operators, date-range restrictions, the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, and the Ethiopian Media Authority’s public repository were systematically consulted. Snowballing from citations in human-rights reports, activist posts on social media, and references in academic studies helped surface additional cases that had received only fleeting mainstream coverage.
The final sample consists of 27 articles. Despite sustained and deliberate efforts to locate and prioritise rural incidents, including targeted searches in regional editions of government media and the use of Amharic keywords more common in rural reporting, only six articles (22%) unambiguously described incidents that took place in clearly rural settings (woredas outside major towns, involving victims travelling long distances on foot, collecting water or firewood, or attending under-resourced primary schools). The remaining 21 articles (78%) focused on incidents in Addis Ababa, regional capitals, or peri-urban zones. This stark rural–urban imbalance is not a product of sampling error but an empirical reflection of actual coverage patterns and constitutes one of the study’s central findings.
Analysis was conducted iteratively using Microsoft Excel as the primary organisational and coding tool. A master spreadsheet was created with one row per article and separate columns for article metadata (title, outlet, date, language, ownership type, location of incident, victim age, etc.) and for emerging analytical categories. In the first phase, each article was read multiple times and subjected to line-by-line open coding; codes and illustrative quotations were entered directly into dedicated columns, allowing rapid visual comparison across cases. Recurrent frames (e.g., “isolated tragic incident,” “breach of family honour,” “failure of parental supervision,” “law enforcement success”), source patterns, linguistic devices (euphemisms, passive constructions, agent deletion), and significant silences were documented systematically.
In the second phase, axial coding was performed by creating additional worksheets that grouped and compared codes across rural/urban location and ownership type. Conditional formatting, filters, and pivot tables facilitated the identification of patterns and divergences. In the third phase, the most salient frames were interpreted in relation to broader socio-cultural norms, journalistic routines, the political economy of Ethiopian media, and the rural–urban visibility gap. Thick description and verbatim excerpts (translated where necessary) are provided in the results section to enable readers to assess the interpretations offered.
Methodological rigor was enhanced through prolonged engagement with the texts over more than fourteen months, peer debriefing sessions with two senior Ethiopian gender scholars experienced in both media analysis and rural fieldwork, meticulous maintenance of an audit trail documenting all coding decisions and revisions, and reflexive memos on researcher positionality. The use of Excel, while less automated than dedicated qualitative software, offered complete transparency, ease of version control, and the flexibility required for the relatively modest sample size while still permitting systematic, replicable analysis.
This methodological framework thus delivers a transparent, theoretically grounded approach that deliberately centres the rural, routine, peacetime cases that have historically been marginalised in both Ethiopian journalism and academic scholarship. By illuminating the discursive mechanisms through which rural schoolgirls’ suffering is rendered invisible or trivial, the study lays an empirical and ethical foundation for advocating more geographically equitable and survivor
centred media practice.
Results
The analysis of the 27 articles revealed a media ecosystem characterised by profound geographic, ownership, and linguistic inequities that systematically disadvantaged rural school-age victims of sexual abuse.
Despite a purposive sampling strategy explicitly designed to maximise the inclusion of rural incidents, only six articles (22 %) focused on abuse occurring outside urban or mixed settings, while twenty-one (78 %) concerned urban or peri-urban cases.
This stark underrepresentation emerged as a finding in itself, confirming the systemic urban bias the study sought to interrogate. Rural reports were dramatically shorter, averaging just 180 words compared with 420 words for urban reports — a difference that severely restricted narrative depth, emotional resonance, and the possibility of structural contextualisation from the outset. Government-affiliated outlets (Ethiopian News Agency, Fana Broadcasting Corporate, Walta) contributed fourteen articles (52 %), while independent outlets (Addis Standard, The Reporter, Capital) produced thirteen (48 %). Temporal distribution showed seventeen articles (63 %) published after the 2023 National Gender-Based Violence Policy Framework, yet rural representation exhibited no discernible improvement.
TABLE I
The institutional-response frame was the most prevalent, appearing in nearly six out of twenty seven articles. It constructed sexual abuse as a containable administrative breach already being addressed through swift state action, thereby defining the problem narrowly and recommending legal resolution while largely absolving broader societal or institutional responsibility.
Victim-blaming and perpetrator-excusing frames together appeared in 70 % of the sample, consistently shifting causal and moral responsibility away from structural conditions and onto individual behaviour, circumstance, or character.
Rural coverage exhibited extreme narrative austerity and erasure. All six rural articles relied exclusively on episodic framing that presented abuse as isolated, unpredictable tragedies devoid of wider context. Survivor voices were entirely absent except for a single independent article in 2025 that quoted a distraught parent: “We are devastated, but no one listens to us in the village.”
Structural explanations linking abuse to poverty, long unsafe commutes, early marriage practices, inadequate school fencing, or legacies of conflict were completely missing. Emotional language remained muted, typically limited to vague references to “community shock.”
By contrast, urban articles averaged more than twice the length, incorporated graphic descriptions of physical injuries in 41 % of cases, quoted survivors or family members in 62 %, and provided thematic contextualisation in 24 % by connecting individual incidents to broader patterns of systemic failure.
Differences according to media ownership were equally pronounced. Government-affiliated outlets applied the institutional-response frame in 81 % of their articles, sourced quotations almost exclusively from police or official statements (92 %), and adopted a formal, resolution-focused tone that aligned closely with state rhetoric (“authorities acted swiftly to restore order”).
Survivor, family, or NGO voices were entirely absent in government reports. Independent outlets, despite operating under legal constraints imposed by the 2020 Hate Speech Proclamation, employed advocacy/justice framing in 42 % of their articles, incorporated perspectives from NGOs in 33 %, quoted survivors or families in 25 %, and maintained a critical tone that explicitly demanded policy reform, safer school environments, and accountability beyond mere arrest.
Linguistic and rhetorical patterns operated systematically to minimise violence and deflect responsibility. Euphemisms softened the brutality of the act — “sexual misconduct” appeared in 67 %, “incident” in 52 %, “compromise” in 30 %, and “defilement” in 22 %. Passive-voice constructions obscured perpetrator agency in 70 % of descriptions (“the act was committed,” “the girl was subjected to misconduct”). Moralistic references to “honour,” “tradition,” or “community values” occurred in 48 % of articles, embedding abuse within cultural frameworks that prioritise collective reputation over individual justice.
Episodic framing dominated overwhelmingly (85 %), isolating events from structural causes, while thematic framing remained marginal (15 %). Emotional language varied sharply by geography and ownership: rural government reports expressed only muted “community shock,” whereas urban independent coverage frequently conveyed outrage, urgency, and moral indignation.
Taken together, these intersecting patterns — geographic minimalism, ownership-driven frame selection, source exclusion, and linguistic deflection — produced a clear hierarchy of empathy and recognition.
Urban cases, though still imperfectly reported, received greater narrative depth, emotional resonance, source diversity, and occasional calls for systemic change. Rural school-age girls, by contrast, were reduced to brief, voiceless, decontextualised tragedies whose suffering, when acknowledged at all, was framed through official resolution narratives that demanded no broader transformation. The media thus emerged not as neutral mirrors of reality but as active participants in perpetuating the silence, stigma, and impunity that make rural girls most vulnerable in the first place.
Discussion
The findings of this study lay bare a deeply stratified media ecosystem in which geography, ownership, and language interact to produce a two-tier system of empathy, accountability, and justice for sexually abused school-age girls in Ethiopia. Far from serving as neutral conduits of information, news outlets actively participate in constructing whose suffering is deemed worthy of sustained attention, whose voice is granted legitimacy, and whose responsibility is minimised or erased altogether. The most striking pattern is the near-total narrative erasure of rural cases. Even in a purposively constructed sample that deliberately prioritised rural incidents through targeted keyword searches and regional archival consultation, only six of the 27 articles (22 %) addressed abuse occurring outside urban or mixed settings. Those six rural reports averaged just 180 words—less than half the length of urban reports—and were stripped of survivor or family voices (save one distraught parent quoted in an independent outlet), devoid of structural contextualisation, and framed exclusively as isolated tragedies.
This geographic bias aligns with global research demonstrating that physical and social proximity to media centres dramatically increases narrative depth and emotional investment (Bello et al., 2020). In Ethiopia, however, the consequences are particularly severe. When the suffering of rural schoolgirls—who constitute the overwhelming majority of victims—is reduced to terse, voiceless paragraphs, public imagination remains stubbornly urban-centred, donor funding and policy attention gravitate toward visible cases, and impunity flourishes in low-visibility regions. The media thus become complicit in perpetuating the very isolation that renders rural girls most vulnerable.
Government-affiliated outlets played a central role in this process by overwhelmingly privileging the institutional-response frame (81 % of their articles). Reports characteristically opened and closed with official statements such as “police have arrested the perpetrator and the case is under investigation,” thereby constructing sexual abuse as a containable administrative breach already resolved through state efficacy. Survivor perspectives were entirely absent, and police or kebele authorities dominated 92 % of quotations. This pattern directly echoes Ejigu’s (2008) earlier observation that state-aligned Ethiopian media portray women and girls as passive beneficiaries of institutional protection rather than rights-bearing agents deserving systemic transformation.
By foregrounding arrests while systematically omitting poverty, long unsafe commutes, early marriage practices, inadequate school infrastructure, or legacies of conflict, government outlets shield entrenched power structures from sustained scrutiny and foster a public perception that the problem is being adequately managed—despite prevalence studies repeatedly demonstrating the opposite (Hailu et al., 2024; Mekonnen et al., 2024).
Independent outlets, operating under the chilling effect of the 2020 Hate Speech and Disinformation Prevention Proclamation, adopted a more critical stance. They employed advocacy/justice framing in 42 % of articles, incorporated NGO perspectives in 33 %, quoted survivors or families in 25 %, and explicitly demanded safer schools, better transport, and policy reform. Yet even these outlets remained overwhelmingly urban-focused, revealing the structural limits of watchdog journalism in a context of legal risk, chronic underfunding, and archival bias toward digitally preserved content. The result is that sharper critique exists—but almost exclusively for cases that occur close to newsrooms.
Linguistic choices emerged as subtle yet pervasive mechanisms of responsibility deflection. Euphemisms such as “sexual misconduct” (67 %), “incident” (52 %), “compromise” (30 %), or “defilement” (22 %) softened the brutality of rape, while passive-voice constructions (“the act was committed,” “the girl was defiled”) obscured perpetrator agency in 70 % of descriptions. Moralistic references to “honour,” “tradition,” or “community values” appeared in 48 % of articles, embedding abuse within cultural frameworks that prioritise collective reputation over individual justice—a pattern long identified by feminist scholars as a core mechanism of victim-blaming in patriarchal societies (Abdullahi et al., 2019).
These linguistic strategies carry particular weight in rural Ethiopia, where news is frequently retransmitted orally in markets, churches, and iddirs; stigmatising language thus reverberates far beyond the original text, reinforcing silence and discouraging formal reporting.
Theoretically, these results extend framing theory in three significant ways. First, they demonstrate that geography functions as a powerful moderator of frame execution: the same institutional response frame that appears decisive and reassuring in urban reports becomes a tool of erasure when applied to rural cases through extreme brevity and source exclusion. Second, ownership emerges as a gatekeeping variable that systematically determines which of Entman’s (1993) four framing functions—problem definition, causal attribution, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation—are emphasised or suppressed. Third, language itself operates as an independent framing device: euphemism, passive voice, and moralistic appeals do not merely describe events but actively redefine them, diluting severity and protecting perpetrators and institutions from moral censure. Together, these moderators produce a “two-tier system of empathy” in which urban girls are more likely to be constructed as credible victims deserving support, while rural girls are rendered invisible or implicitly blameworthy.
Practically, the systematic silencing of rural voices documented here helps explain why legislative and policy reforms—the 2005 Criminal Code amendments, the 2018 Roadmap to End Child Marriage, and the 2023 GBV Policy Framework—continue to have limited impact in remote areas. Problems that are rarely framed as public crises seldom generate the sustained political will required for meaningful change.
The findings therefore support four concrete recommendations: (1) mandatory trauma-informed, survivor-centred journalism training for editors and reporters; (2) substantial public and donor investment in community radio stations broadcasting in local languages; (3) development of national ethical guidelines for GBV reporting that explicitly mandate geographic equity and linguistic responsibility; and (4) rural media-literacy programmes designed to help families and girls recognise and challenge stigmatising frames.
The study is not without limitations. The sample of 27 articles, while deliberately constructed for interpretive depth, remains small and archivally skewed toward digitally preserved content. Radio—the primary information source for over 80 % of rural households—was excluded due to absence of transcripts. Translation of Amharic texts risked losing culturally embedded nuances of moralistic discourse. Finally, the analysis examines texts rather than audience reception, preventing causal claims about effects on school attendance, reporting behaviour, or mental health. These constraints, however, do not undermine the core findings; they illuminate the very structural barriers that make rural gender-based violence one of Ethiopia’s most under-researched and under reported crises. Future scholarship must adopt multi-modal, longitudinal, and participatory designs—incorporating radio transcripts, social-media analysis, photovoice projects, and collaborative coding with rural journalists and survivors—to build a more comprehensive understanding of how media framing interacts with lived experience in remote communities. Until such work is undertaken, media will continue to function less as mirrors of reality than as gatekeepers deciding whose pain counts and whose remains invisible.
Conclusion
Between January 2020 and December 2025, Ethiopian news media represented sexual abuse of rural school-age girls, when they represented it at all, through extreme brevity, exclusive reliance on official sources, euphemistic language, and episodic framing. These choices effectively erased the majority of victims from national discourse and public imagination. Only six of the 27 articles analysed (22 %) addressed rural incidents; those six averaged 180 words, contained no survivor voices except one, in one instance, a single grieving parent, and offered no structural explanation for the violence. By contrast, urban cases received longer narratives, graphic detail, survivor quotations, and occasional calls for systemic reform. Government-aligned outlets overwhelmingly shielded state institutions through narratives of swift arrest and resolution, while even independent outlets, despite sharper critique, remained overwhelmingly urban-focused.
The result is a stark two-tier system of empathy and accountability that mirrors and reinforces existing geographic, political, and economic power structures.
This study has shown that media do not merely reflect the marginalisation of rural girls; they actively reproduce it. The institutional-response frame, linguistic deflection, source exclusion, and episodic isolation of events all converge to render rural suffering simultaneously hyper-visible as “tragedy” and invisible as a public problem demanding structural change.
In a country where more than 80 % of the population lives rurally, such systemic erasure has profound consequences for policy prioritisation, resource allocation, and the daily safety of millions of school-age girls.
Future scholarship must move decisively beyond archived print and online texts. It should incorporate community radio transcripts, Telegram and TikTok content, longitudinal tracking of framing shifts, and, most importantly, participatory methods that place rural survivors’ voices at the very centre of knowledge production. Experimental designs comparing advocacy-framed versus institution-framed broadcasts could finally establish causal links to help-seeking behaviour, school retention, and community attitudes. Intersectional analyses exploring how ethnicity, religion, disability, and displacement compound geographic erasure remain urgently needed.
Until rural schoolgirls’ stories are consistently amplified rather than erased, legislative and policy progress will remain hollow achievements confined to urban enclaves of visibility. Transforming media framing is not merely a technical exercise in journalistic practice; it is a moral and political imperative for achieving genuine gender justice in Ethiopia. The silence documented in these pages is not neutral; it is complicity. It is time to make the invisible undeniably present.
References
[1] Hailu, K., et al. (2024). Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics, 10(3-s). https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v10i3-s.4121 [2] Mekonnen, B. D., et al. (2024). PMC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085442/
[3] Abdullahi, H., et al. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of childhood sexual abuse in Sub-Saharan Africa. Systematic Reviews, 8(105). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0969-9
[4] The Guardian Staff. (2025). The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/…
[5] Obamo, Z. (2025). HapaKenya. https://hapakenya.com/…
[6] UNESCO. (2023). Education for all global monitoring report: Rural-urban disparities in access to information. UNESCO Publishing.
[7] Ejigu, B. (2008). Media representation of violence against women in Ethiopia [ Master’s thesis, Addis Ababa University]. AAU Institutional Repository. http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/4028
[8] Bello, H. J., et al. (2020). Global news framing of sexual violence: A machine learning analysis. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.07490
[9] Nigatu, H., & Raji, I. (2024). Algorithmic amplification of sexualized content in Amharic YouTube recommendations. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16656
[10] Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
[11] Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
[12] Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or vamp: How the press covers sex crimes. Oxford University Press.
[13] Lamb, S. (1999). Constructing the victim: Popular images of criminality and the innocent victim. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept (pp. 108–138). New York University Press.
[14] Meyers, M. (2004). African American women and violence: Gender, race, and class in the news. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21(2), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393180410001688030
[15] Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. University of Chicago Press. [16] Abebe, et al. (2022). Journal of Women’s Health Issues and Care. https://www.heraldopenaccess.us/…
[17] Assefa, et al. (2025). Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1369245. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2024.1369245 [18] Berhanu, et al. (2022). BMC Women’s Health, 22, 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02076-3
[19] Demissie, et al. (2024). African Journal of Reproductive Health, 28(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2024/v28i1.5 [20] Gebre, et al. (2023). BMJ Global Health, 8(3), e010270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010270
[21] Gebeyehu, et al. (2021). PLoS ONE, 16(3), e0247386. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247386
[22] Kebede, et al. (2020). International Journal of Sexual and Reproductive Health Care, 5, 132. https://www.reprodgroup.us/… [23] Lemma, et al. (2025). Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 5, 1340038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1340038 [24] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
[25] Mekonnen, B. D., et al. (2021). Reproductive Health, 18(1), 255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01277-7 [26] Shiferaw, et al. (2021). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(15–16). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218807097 [27] Tadesse, et al. (2021). Open Access Library Journal, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107708
[28] Tesfaye, et al. (2023). BMC Women’s Health, 23(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-02150-w
[29] The New Humanitarian. (2025). https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/…
[30] Woldesenbet, et al. (2025). Heliyon, 10(2), e41720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41720 [31] Yimam, et al. (2024). PMC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990560/ [32] BBC News. (2024). https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c07edzd37zro
[33] Addis Standard. (2023). https://addisstandard.com/